What Part of “Slay All The Infidels Where You Find Them” Do You Not Understand or Refuse to Accept As The Reality Of Islam?

Muhammad Youssuf Abdulazeez, the 24-year-old Kuwait-born terrorist who massacred five military personnel in Chattanooga, Tennessee, is the personification of Islam, of course uttering such truthful insensitivities causes the self-loathing brainwashed faint of heart to pass out.

Abdulazeez was a practicing Muslim, he followed Islam, his family adhere to the religion of war, murder, death, rape, and did exactly what Islam and its holy book the Koran commands all Muslims to do: “Slay all the infidels where you find them.”

Terror is what all Muslims are commanded by Mohammad to commit:

And KILL them (the unbelievers) wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers. (Sura 2, verse 191).

What part of Islam is evil and not peace do we not understand?  Why do we continue tolerating these people and opening our immigration doors to Muslims versus rejecting them? Because we refuse to admit the truth. Actually we have been commanded to never admit the truth, but accept and tolerate the lies perpetrated by the Left that agrees with Islam.

That stupidity enabled the latest terrorist to call Muslims to act through his Facebook page, while the FBI ignored his rhetoric as harmless:

Brothers and sisters don’t be fooled by your desires, this life is short and bitter and the opportunity to submit to Allah may pass you by

If you make the intention to follow allahs way 100 % and put your desires to the side, allah will guide you to what is right.

Following Allah means waging jihad against all, infidels, not hanging out with us and talking about Bruce Jenner’s sex change.

Every Muslim is a potential terrorist, not some idiot-termed “lone wolf” with emotional problems caused by too much education and money. If Muslims do not leave the religion of Islam and become ex-Muslims, they are either terrorists or terror enablers, because a bad Muslim is a Muslim who renounces Islam and leaves that religion because they reject its evil.

Islam requires slaughtering human beings like cattle, burning gays alive, terrorizing humanity into submission and slavery.

All Muslims are commanded to wage jihad against all non-Muslims, 9/11 was the act of obedience to Islam. After 9/11 Muslims should have been deported and banned from the United States. Instead, we were told to tolerate Islam, because to think negatively toward Muslims is bigoted. Say that “B” word and Christians will crucify themselves so they are never called bigot by terrorists or bleeding-hearted useless idiots.

We accept and tolerate Muslims because we have been brainwashed and indoctrinated by the Left (that sides with Islam because the Left despises life and liberty) to foolishly assume Islam is peace.

We are afraid to admit the truth.

Islam has been attacking the world non-stop for 1400 years, Christians have been preaching peace, love and Christ’s redemption for all for 2000 years, but Christians are condemned as vicious and Muslims are depicted as the most peaceful people since Hitler was considered a jolly good chap!

Islam is not peace or Muslims would not be torturing and murdering gays all over the Middle East, taking away rights of human beings to live by slaughtering innocent men because they chose a lifestyle Islam hates.

Christians don’t approve of the homosexual lifestyle, but we never murder gays, nor do we allow such a heinous crime. We forbid murder, because God calls murder evil, and to kill (beyond self-defense or accidental killing) anyone because you dislike their lifestyle or beliefs or who they are in general is vile. Islam does exactly that on a daily basis and gets away with it on the grounds of religion.

It is lawful in Islam to rape victims of rape, because Muslim rape victims are considered adulteresses. It is lawful for Muslim men to rape women if they feel sexual urges, because rape in Islam is equal to sex.

Christians do not commit those heinous acts, Christians wont kill gays, Muslims do, but are Christians are condemned as hateful for disagreeing with and not accepting homosexuality.

Islam is permitted to shout “Death To America,” but it’s considered immorally detestable, and just plain bigoted, to say “Death To Islam.”

Why would anyone think it wrong to destroy the movement of death, murder, rape, and war? Why wouldn’t any moral person see that destroying a movement of full-blown evil is just? Why wouldn’t anyone want a movement that slaughters and rapes stopped, ended, snuffed out?

Why would anyone embrace death? Why wouldn’t anyone want destruction brought upon murder? Think about it? If you answer, “but its mean to hate Islam”  you are saying its mean to hate evil and we must embrace it with love in order to change its evil heart and wicked mind.

Why allow that murderous movement to stay in this country founded on Judeo-Christian principles when the followers of Islam are plotting to destroy this country from within through violent attacks? If we allow that we say there is nothing wrong with Muslims attacking us, after all, we deserve it for being American and they deserve to do it to us for our being American.

That’s exactly what we are doing.

The result is more attacks: Fort Hood (that was just workplace violence, so stop being a bigot!) Times Square (that terror attempt may have been simply traffic road rage, so stop being a racist bigot!)  The Shoe-Bomber (hey, it was a long flight and he’s French, so he has a really good excuse to be nasty, but you don’t!)  Boston Marathon Bombing (they were refugees and you bigoted Americans have no idea what its like for a terrorist to have to go through our easy immigration process that welcomes anyone interested in destroying the United states!)  Oklahoma beheading (workplace violence. Besides, that woman offended that Muslims freak by telling him she did not want to convert to his violent religion! How dare she!), the list goes on but I would hate to sound like an anti-Islam bigot.

If you believe leftist indoctrination then I wonder if 9/11 bothered you. I wonder if massacring thousands of innocent lives really matters to you, unless they are violent black thugs killing cops for killing violent criminals. Oh yes, then lives matter!

Give me one, good reason why evil can and should remain in the United states? Give me one, good reason why all Muslims should not be deported. Tell me why the U.S. should not have been deported all Muslims after 9/11 and banned Islamic immigration in the USA forever?

And do not tell me all Muslims are decent people and a small handful of radicals hijacked a peaceful religion, and Muslims are not bothering anyone, they come here for a better life, because that thinking ingrained in Americans is getting this country attacked. Not to mention its a load of bull manure that could fertilize the Sahara!

America rejected God, but embraces Islam. Americans have been retrained to hate peace and embrace evil. We have been trained to rejected Christianity that preaches peace and love and accept violence by calling it peace. We are forbidden to say the name of Jesus in public because it offends Muslims, taught from birth to murder all non-Muslims, but we tolerate Muslims and their violent religion.

That makes as much sense as Bruce Jenner’s makeover that looks like Sandra Bullock morphed into Betty Davis’s “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane.”

Don’t Americans want peace instead of death to America? Why wouldn’t we say death to that evil?

I hate murder, I hate rape, I hate torture of human beings, I hate that which massacres human life in order to conquer life and force it into slavery. Doesn’t that sound right to feel, think and believe that way? No, it’s socially just to embrace an evil that commits unthinkable horrors upon human beings, and is on our American soil plotting and committing jihad here in the U.S.

When are we going to reject Islamic immigration?

When will we Americans stop embracing evil?  How many more attacks will we endure? How many more Americans have to die at the hands of Muslims before we reject them and their religion? How much more will we Americans put up with before we push Islam off our shores, out of our country, deport them all so they know they are not welcome in the United States, because we will not allow our country to be overtaken by violence?

To tolerate Islam and its followers is to say we embrace war, murder, rape, death. What part of “slay all the infidels” don’t we understand?

I was Wrong About Trump! I would Rather Elect A Sudden Conservative Than Phony Progressives Masscarading As Conservative Republicans

Over the last year I flip flopped between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. Cruz was assumed to be a Tea Party Conservative. At least he seemed to be when running for Senate and at times during his tenure. I jumped the Ted wagon as soon as I decided to do some research to see just how eligible he is for the presidency given his foreign birth.

Ted Cruz claims he is eligible, he claims the Supreme Court upholds a 1790 Immigration Act that allowed for children born on foreign soil and brought to US soil and naturalized is still upheld. It is not, the 1795 Immigration Act that repealed the 1790 Immigration Act everyone quotes   still stands, despite efforts to ignore the fact.

Cruz is not “natural born” as the Constitution states one must be (the other part of the Claus clearly states anyone who fought for the Declaration, and heir children, would become citizens upon the signing of the Constitution in 1787) in order to be President of the United States, he was brought here from Canada and eventually became a citizen.

Note: The 14th Amendment applies only to Black Americans due to slave laws that prevented blacks from becoming citizens despite black families being born on this soil for two centuries.  The 14th provides citizenship to children of slaves, as well as tribal Americans, but never children of any immigrant, nor does it allow  immigrant children (Ted Cruz) to run for the Presidency and take that Office.

Cruz is lying and knows full-well that SCOTUS cases attempting to overturn the 1795 Act never accomplished that.

Note for those who want to read all the upheld awful proof: This well researched blog gives every single Supreme Court case proving the 1795 Act still stands.

This means that Senator Marco Rubio is not eligible to be president either. His parents did not become US citizens until after he was born. Both men and the GOP know this and refuse to uphold the US Constitution’s laws.

Why would I ever elect liars who are openly trampling the Constitution? I would rather vote for a sudden conservative, a born again conservatives!

That is why (despite my last post wondering if I could trust Trump due to his saying all the things I think and feel and hoping it was not just talk) I am changing my vote to Donald Trump.

I have watched every speech by Trump and the others since the primaries began and Trump is the only guy who remains consistent, not to mention real  throughout every speech. The others tend to define their speeches according to those they talk to. And if they are talking to Hispanics, Cruz and Rubio have the anti-American habit of speaking in Spanish versus English, the official language of the United states of America.

Trump makes no bones about being a liberal Democrat most of his life. He votes both ways depending on who he feels is best for New York and the Country. Most people, if they are honest with themselves, do the same! I have.  I have voted for Democrats in my home state who were more conservative on economic and social issues that Republican candidates. It’s about the Constitution for me, not phony whims.

As to Trump supporting Planned Parenthood? It’s no different than the professed Born Again Christian George W. Bush NEVER once attempting to push to overturn Roe V. Wade.

I can say the same of Cruz and Rubio: When in their Senate tenure have they tried to get Roe V. Wade overturned? Have we seen Bush or Cruz and Rubio attempt to get cases into the High Court? No. So what is the difference between Trump and those who never tried to use their power to attempt an repeal?

Nothing. Actions do speak louder than words.

Trump admits he has been wrong and if seeing horrific videos of PPH harvesting human baby parts is what it took for Trump to turn his back on that organization, I’m glad. Can you say the same for Hillary or her supporters?

Look at the GOP record: In 1980 they told my generation not to elect Reagan. We were told “vote for George H. W. Bush,” he was the only man to beat Carter. Conservatives refused Bush, he was a big government crony who wanted to push for more federalized education in a country where the Constitution forbid government rights to how the American people are educated.

in 2000, his big government, pro-amnesty, open border son, Governor Bush, was placed on the ticket. “W” used his tenure to implement his father’s dreams for more federal control over education with No Child Left behind, a bill that Bush put Sen. Ted Kennedy’s name on.

Note: never trust a man who left woman to drown in four feet of water to never leave your children in poverty and illiteracy!

We have millions more illiterates thanks to government intrusion, not to mention invasion. The result is less jobs for Americans because illegals have stolen labor jobs by undercutting American wages to that of third world wages, and the Chinese and Indians are given tech jobs at low wages in order to push us Americans out. Now we have half the country on welfare and not because they want that, but because they have been out of work, or part-time working at low wages that have not risen in decades thanks to Republicans not fighting Democrat regulations and minimum wage laws designed to drive down the economy.

Both parties destroyed the American Experiment and Originalism and neither deserves my vote. But I have to vote, and I am voting, but I will not give my vote to big government cronies who have supported Common Core, Amnesty to illegals, and none have tried to deport illegals or the terrorists they import under the disguise called “Muslim Refugee.”

Trump admits to getting wrong when it when it comes to Muslims. At first he thought they were victims who needed refuge, but they have attacked us so often, and those attackers are all imported as refugees that Trump admits they have to go and there has to be a halt on Muslim immigration, something Bush never did after 9/11.

Bush imported 70,000 Muslim refugees per year after 9/11, while telling us to never profile anyone who looked Arab or is Arab or Muslim when we should have done the opposite. Jimmy Carter deported and banned Muslims after the 1979 Iran Hostage Crisis.

Cruz and Rubio pander to Hispanics because they want the votes, but that is playing the race card over America and all things American. You’re either running for President of the United States or President of Cuba, Mexico and South American countries.  Both parties run for both while denying America’s right to sovereignty.

Trump is the only guy pushing for deportation and bans and building the wall. The others say it is cruel to round up people by force and deport. Since when is that cruel? Since when is upholding the law cruel?

And people wonder why Trump rose up and has so much support?

Because most of us want illegals and Muslims gone, because most of us want the Chinese and Indians out of our jobs that companies are firing us from and forcing us to train these foreigners to do our jobs!

Because most of us realize that voting for pro-life candidates never attempted any repeal of abortion, nor has it made us a conservative country again.

Because most of are angry that Cruz supported the disastrous George W. Bush’s policies only to backtrack on his record when running for Senate and now president. Now Cruz wants homeschooling parents under federal regulation : “ Ted Cruz’s S.306 defines “home schooling” as a “private school” if those parents want to qualify to use 529 plans—”investment accounts that remain tax-free as long as the funds are used for qualified educational purposes” the United States Government considers “qualified, educational.” So much for State’s Rights and individual private property  rights under the constitution!

Because many of us realize that we would not have Obamacare and Same Sex Marriage laws had Ted Cruz not helped to push Chief Justice John Roberts on the Supreme court Bench. Morals did not win us with the men professing Jesus, immorality won!

Since Reagan left office Republicans have either moved leftward or the GOP has pushed for Democrats to invade the Party with progressive polices that moved the country leftward into European socialism.

I voted for George W. Bush twice, though in 2004 I came to regret my vote and the President: Bush never shut down the borders, never deported tens of millions of illegal aliens, nor did he deport and place a ban on the very people who attacked the United States on 9/11.

Remember: During the 2000 Presidential Debate Bush demanded a ban on racial profiling, especially profiling Arabs. Never mind this country was attacked in 1993 when Muslims bombed the World Trade Center. We were not supposed to profile the very people of whom Islamic terror is the politics and religion.

Bush professed to be a Born Again Christian and he nominated the radically liberal John “Obamacare” Roberts to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

In 2008 the GOP demanded that Senator John McCain was the only candidate who could beat Barack Obama. McCain sided with Obama whenever conservatives criticized Obama’s Muslim  upbringing in Indonesia and his communist rearing, his Muslim name, and Obama’s friendships with American terrorists Bill Ayes and Bernadine Dorhn, his radically racist friends and pastor, and his questionable birth and college records.

Ironically the liberal Trump  raised the roof about Obama’s non-existent birth certificate and his mysterious college records when Obama proved to be a disaster.

In 2011, Trump admitted,

“I was his [Obama] biggest cheerleader. If you go back three years, I’m saying, ‘Do a great job.’ I wanted him to do a great job. I still want him to do a great job… I thought he was a positive person, always, I thought he’d be like a cheerleader for the country. I think he is creating a class warfare that is a very dangerous thing for the country.”

How many thought the same of McCain and Romney? How many voted for those two because “they are the only candidate to beat Barack Obama?”

McCain and Romney never tried to defeat Obama.

Let’s look back to 2006: Bush’s open borders supported by Republican leadership lost the 2006 House and Senate to Democrat control. Bush supported guest worker programs and he called for giving low wage labor jobs to illegals already here, thus robbing millions of Americans of jobs they would work at higher American wages.

Republican Senator Tom Tancredo, who warned Bush for six years to lock down borders and deport illegals  summed it up best:

“This [immigration policy] is being sold to Republicans as a way of gaining support amongst Hispanics in this country, and we have to do this in order to accomplish that. Does anybody in their right mind believe that Sens. Schumer and Menendez would be pushing this bill if they thought for a millisecond that it is going to [benefit] the Republicans?

And we want another Republican insider? Look what they have done to us!

Republicans did nothing to go after Obama granting Holder Executive Privilege, an act of fraud since there was no reason to exert such.

Note: Obama’s deal was no different than George W. Bush’s Mexican gun walk deal “Operation Wide Receiver:” The weapons were sold to drug cartels and violent Mexican gangs.

What about the 2012 Debate: Romney had the chance to destroy Obama after four American men were brutally massacred in Libya by Muslim terrorists. Romney could have exposed what the Mainstream Media hid from the public,  Romney refused on the grounds of being nice and not looking racist.

Romney lost to Obama. Now the GOP wants candidates with a “Comprehensive Immigration Plan,” versus the Constitutional one implemented over 200 years-ago and Eisenhower used to round up and deport millions of illegals.

Thanks to both parties we have an invasion with  the majority of illegals being violent criminal gangs, drug dealers, rapists and murderers.

Thanks to both parties we are invaded by South-of-the-Border, Middle Eastern and Asian (also code phrase for Muslim when not Chinese or Indian) racists by the millions each year, all of whom we are told to apologize to after they attack and murder Americans.

How many of us have been screaming against illegal immigration, Muslim refugee immigration, all third world immigration that imports high crime, poverty and economic disaster?

Trump has the guts to say what millions of us think and he has refused to back down and apologize to Hispanics when bleeding-hearted doo-gooders childishly call his rhetoric and tone against these illegal invaders monsters mean and insulting.

I’ve had to ask myself if seeking a purist, a constitutional conservative originalist, by choosing a convert is the answer. I think it is. The Republican candidate field is full of RINOs, progressives who have expanded federal power and trampled local and States Rights, so why would I choose one of those Wilsonian-style thugs over a man who admits to being a liberal Democrat who voted for Carter and then Reagan and Bush, who admits to supporting liberal issues, as well as conservative ones.

The so-called conservative candidates are not admitting to their progressive fraud.

That cannot continue with any president or the Experiment is gone. I would rather take the chance on Trump than with obvious frauds.

 

Trump Says All The Right Things, But Talk Is Not Good Enough For Me, Talk Won’t Save America

 

 

 

 

Conservative Republican candidate Donald Trump has said a lot of things I like: He has spoken out against illegal immigration, saying “We’re going to keep the families together, but they have to go.” I agree, and personally I don’t care if they have nowhere to go, because they are not our problem, they are the problem of the countries they came from. Illegals are the worst thing (next to Islam in America) to happen to this country.

Trump nails it on immigration, but at the end of the day that’s just not enough for me.

What about the Islamic invasion that is murdering Americans? He spoke out against islamic attacks after two Muslims massacred their co-workers in San Bernardino, California, but prior to that, Trump lambasted Americans who spoke out against Islam.

Last year, Trump blamed Stop Islamization Of America founder Pamela Geller when a Muslim in Garland, Texas tried to murder her, Dutch politician Geert Wielders, and Draw Mohammad Contest winner (an ex-Muslim and activist against Islam) Bosch Fawstin for drawing Mohammad, insisting,

“she’s just taunting everybody…I watched Pam prior, and it looks like she’s just taunting everybody. What is she doing? Drawing Muhammad and it looks like she’s taunting people…what are they [Pamela Geller and Bosch Fawstin] doing drawing Muhammad? Isn’t there something else they can draw? They can’t do something else? They have to be in the middle of Texas and on Muhammad?”

 

Mr. Trump: It’s called Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Expression, something you do every day Mr. Trump when you call women dogs and fat slobs, something you do when you express your opinion of other candidates or other countries, when you speak out against Obama, etc., it is called the Law of the Constitution. If you don’t like that Mr. Trump, shut your big, insulting mouth.

Furthermore, what right does Islam have to murder anyone for drawing pictures of Mohammad? No right at all.  And Trump should have said just that.

I agree with Trump for his saying we need to halt all Islamic immigration. his campaign website gives statistics about how Muslims in America feel about America and Americans who are not Islamic: They hate us, they want us under Sharia, under Islamic submission. Knowing that, Trump made this statement that proves he has no idea what the Koran and Islamic law command:

“Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life.”

The hatred comes from the political and religious beliefs (which are one in Islam and not allowed to be separate) created by a murderous prophet who raped little girls he forced into marriage, while mass slaughtering everyone who refused to follow his brand of religion. Trump should point this out f he has done any research on Islam. If he has not, I suggest he speak to Geller and Fawstin.

There are Muslims who hate Islam and want out of the religion (Bosch Fawstin was one and he left and lives under the that of murder) and life, but they are often murdered before they can actually get out and get away from their families.

Again: If Trump bothered to ask Pamela Geller and Bosch Fawstin why they speak out against Islam, he would have found this out and gotten to the bottom of what Islam really is and why it must be banned in America.

I suggest Trump read the Koran, it has 109 versus commanding Muslims to massacre all non-Muslims. If he has, tell Americans that is why Islamic immigration must be halted and Islam has no place in America.

Donald Trump is not a conservative; he is the man who praised the illegal Supreme Court ruling in “Kelo v The City of New London” that says private land can be confiscated by anyone for the use of private purposes. Donald Trump loved this ruling because he has illegally used eminent domain to confiscate private land for his casinos. You cannot use land for casinos or health spas (Kelo) because those things are not needed highways and railroads or areas needed for towns.

What about taxation?

Remember this very let wing Democrat remark to 60 Minute’s Scott Pelley:

Scott Pelley: Who are you going to raise taxes on?

Donald Trump:If you look at actually raise, some very wealthy are going to be raised. Some people that are getting unfair deductions are going to be raised. But overall it’s going to be a tremendous incentive to grow the economy and we’re going to take in the same or more money. And I think we’re going to have something that’s going to be spectacular.”

Scott Pelley: “But Republicans don’t raise taxes.”

Donald Trump: “Well, we’re not raising taxes.”

The Founders never want the government confiscating income and property taxes, because those two things are private property. The King used to confiscate those two things from Americans.

Taking either always enriches the government, not the people.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy said this of taxes:

“It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now… [when you do so] efforts to avoid tax liabilities…cause “certain types of less productive activity more profitable than more valuable undertakings… [this always] … “inhibits our growth and efficiency.”

Thomas Sowell points out of Obama’s tax hikes n the rich that,

“According to the Internal Revenue Service, there are more than 2,700,000 people who earn $250,000 a year or more—and fewer than one-tenth of them earn a million dollars or more. So more than nine-tenths of the people who would be hit with the higher taxes supposedly aimed at ‘millionaires and billionaires’ are neither.”

Taxing the rich means you must tax the middle class, not just millionaires and billionaires, as Trump insists, but if you excessively tax those earning $1 million or more, you punish them and take away any reason to create and earn more, and there goes hiring more.

Trump should know this more than anyone. He is a multi-billionaire businessman. Would he be happy if the government takes half of everything he earns and owns?

Trump has supported Common Core and now, suddenly, says education should be at the local level. Trump never sent his children to public schools, neither did he attend public schools, but every Democrat (and Republican candidate whose brother and father were president so he should be), who never has anything personally to do with Common Core and public schools, always wants everyone else’s kids indoctrinated at the taxpayer’s expense. That is until they decide to run as a Republican, then suddenly they are against what they once supported.

The fact is Donald Trump is about winning at everything and that’s fine on Reality TV and business deals, but simply winning is not good enough for me as an American voter. I don’t want anyone wining just because they talk good. Hitler and Lenin talked a really good talk, so did Neville Chamberlain, and look what that gave the world.

We Republican voters can win with any Republican candidate, but what if any Republican is another big government progressive? Donald Trump has always been a big government progressive Democrat until he suddenly became anti-big government this past spring.

Being a Republican is just not good enough for me. That is not what I want for a president, it’s not what I want for America: I want the Constitution upheld, I want big government taken down and returned to the limited Constitutional Republic.

At the end of the day I must listen closely to what every candidate says, look at their track record, how have they voted until now? Trump has a track record of not voting and supporting left wing Democrats and those policies, and he has a horrible habit of misusing the Constitution for his own gain at the loss of citizens he ran over wrongly to get what he wanted. Isn’t that what Obama has been doing for seven years by abusing the Constitution illegally to enact unlawful acts upon the citizens?

Obama has opened the door for anyone to further wield unlawful power against the people, or (if we get a Constitional Conservative with honesty into office) a leader who will use that misused Executive Pen to undo and repeal all unconstitutional abuses Obama has committed.

What if Trump loves executive power too much and wields it to get what he wants versus what the Constitution outlines and must be upheld according to the people?

I don’t doubt Trump loves America, I believe he does, but power in the wrong hands is too intoxicating and Trump loves power, he loves being number one, but, being an American president is not about being number one, it’s about serving the people who are the actual power.

American leaders are only servants of the people, leaders are not kings, they are not the House of Lords as too many American leaders have made themselves. Furthermore, only Congress is allowed to make laws, not presidents. But Obama gave the Executive the power to be the ultimate power and lawmaker like a British prime minister with full power to make and break laws and change the system as he sees fit by enacting The Act of Parliament.

We need a president who will completely undo that through repeal or we will go beyond the Constitution and it will take something drastic to change us back to America.

I’m not willingly to take that chance with Trump. He may say things I love and want to hear, but that is not good enough for me. I can’t vote for what sounds good. Germany and Russia made that mistake once, it was a disaster.

FemiNazis Want Girl’s Lego Toys Banned: They Look Too Much Like Girls!

 

The Radical Feminist Movement has been trying to rip the estrogen out of women for over 50 years. The left wing, man-haters are angry the Pill didn’t grow them penises, even if they have to break your little girls out of the habit of acting and looking like little girls, by their hairy-arm-pitted gods they will!

Griping feminists demand to have it all as women, all the while desperately attempting to rob everything feminine from women. And that’s not good enough for them, which is  why they must control the weakest among us: Children and their toys.

Girls should not play with dolls, that might make little girls grow up wanting to be mothers, something gay men are far better at than women. Girls should play with boy’s toys (since we are raising a generation of boys who are being trained to be women) that should discontinue looking macho, as they were designed to be, because feminists have been screaming from years that boyish looking boy’s toys are anti-girl. When that’s corrected and the boy’s toys include toys remade to suit girl’s feminine taste, the feminists are further infuriated, because now girls can’t be the way they really ought to be, or rather told by feminists what they are born to be—boys or preferably, no gender at all.

Feminism pushes a false gender identity narrative that is created to destroy traditional family, best destroyed by indoctrinating children who can be brainwashed to grow up to never be who they were born to be if the Radical Feminists have their way.

Unless people give into Radical Feminism’s strong-arming for a genderless society where men are actually girl counterparts to women, it’s not enough, because d*mn it, girls are still coming out of the womb as girls!

Unless pharmaceutical companies develop a pill that prevents girls from developing in the womb, or forces women to grow penises on every child in the womb so feminists can get rid of the female gender they obviously hate, left wing radicals will continue shoving their misery down everyone’s throats, including children who need to realize that women must, as Marxist feminist Andrea Dworkin demanded, “fight back against their male oppressors, but actually to form their own, gender-exclusive nation-state.”

I assume the nation state is to be built with  chunky Lego plastic lesbians, because in 2012, Lego opened the toy market to girl’s and a big, can of feminist worms. You see, little girls like the chunky plastic bricks, but not because the Feminist Movement demanded it, rather, Lego is a billion-dollar toy company that rose to the top because they understand what kinds of toys children want. That is why Lego created Lego Friends. Making money means giving people what they want, that includes children. But Lego made a mistake, they created Lego for girls in a way that appeals to girls: Girly looking Legos.

For some strange reason that confuses the male-wanna-be mind-set of feminists, women and girls adore the colors pink yellow!

I’m not sure you can actually make something look girly out of a chunky piece of brick, but Bill Clinton did with Hillary, so I suppose Lego can. No matter, unless the Lego girl is mannish, Lego Friends is assaulting little girls by making them think they should be little girls.

Feminists might want to look at the Lego Friends sales. The line is so popular with girls; in 2015, Lego “became the world’s most valuable toy company at $15 billion, surpassing Mattel, which makes Barbie dolls, among other toys. Lego’s annual report put 2012 revenue at $4.09 billion, profits at $981 million.”

Parents should consider buying stock in kids toys just to make up the cost of 18 years buying plastic overlooked for the paper box.

You would think everyone would be delighted, the girls got what they wanted–more toys. Everyone is happy, except feminists, who claim Lego Friends look too much like girls and that’s unfair to girls.

If being born a girl who has more manly-looking features is so hideously fair,  plastic surgeons would not be as filthy rich as they are.

The broo ha-ha over Lego Friends looking too much like girls seemingly started when a seven year-old named Charlotte became so irate over seeing how Lego Friends catered to her feminine side (instead of her radically feminized-by-age-seven-side), she wrote a letter to Legos, expressing how Legos has seemingly destroyed her obviously indoctrinated life:  The lack of strong looking female Legos characters has this seven-year-old ready to call it a day! Boy’s Legos are truck drivers; the girl’s Legos are pretty girls wearing makeup, dressed in pink and yellow, and they love to shop!

Charlotte’s letter states:

Dear Lego company,

My name is Charlotte. I am 7 years old and I love legos but I don’t like that there are more Lego boy people and barely any Lego girls. Today I went to a store and saw legos in two sections the girls pink and the boys blue. All the girls did was sit at home, go to the beach, and shop, and they had no jobs but the boys went on adventures, worked, saved people, and had jobs, even swam with sharks. I want you to make more Lego girl people and let them go on adventures and have fun ok!?!

Thank you.

From Charlotte

This kids sounds like a Norman Lear script!

As always, girls being girls who love to shop and look like girls is terribly bad. Well, maybe if you’re the man who pays my Bergdorf’s bill, but its far worse if girls don’t realize they are not supposed to be girls, they ought to believe they were born without gender and forced to grow up choosing whether or not they want to pee standing up or sitting down. You might not feel that way when you catch your husband raiding your closet because he wants to wear your Yves Saint Laurent dresses. Just ask Liza Minelli!

Give me a break! A seven-year-old political activist who hates girl’s toys?!

Charlotte’s real problem is not girl’s toys portraying girls as girls so much as she is obviously indoctrinated by moron leftist parents who don’t want their child to be a child at all, much less a girl (they’re probably Swedes), but a left wing lesbian activist, otherwise, where did a seven-year-old get the idea to write a letter aimed against girly Legos for girls. She’s seven!

I played with my brothers Tonka Trucks, all girls did, but I turned those Tonka trucks into glorious shopping carts! I loaded the yellow trucks with my mother’s supply of Coty Lipstick. The Red ones of course!

I washed one truck with mother’s Chanel No. 5. That offense against boydom when over like the Hindenburg on New Jersey, but I’m a girl, that’s what we do–make everything look and smell pretty.

The truth is feminists hate women and girls, because they despise the female gender. If they did not then where are all the feminists fighting to save women and girls from swarthy brutes of Muslim men raping women all over the planet because their anti-women religion Islam gives them the right and command to rape women and girls?

Charlotte’s parents might want to tell her about the real War on Women: Islam.

Now that Lego has created Legos for girls, feminists want the line removed from shelves and as far away from little girl’s eyes, because Lego Friends are pink and it causes seven-year-olds to have mid-life crisis’!

Basically, boy’s manly looking toys are a war on girls unless the girl’s toys look just as brute-manly as the boys. If you ask me Lego already looks like Hillary Clinton due to the chunky plastic. That alone should make them wildly popular with radically feminist seven-year-olds.

Lego caved to FemiNazi’s demands they man-up their chunky plastic girls. But that only made radical feminists angrier: The new manlier Lego Friends doesn’t look like the men!  The new Lego Friends scientists are wearing makeup, they have girly hair, and they still like to wear pink, even to the laboratory!

Had Tonka made trucks for girls in my day, I would have wanted a pink one designed to haul loads of red lipstick. I’m a girl, I don’t care to man-up to do any job! If I could work my vegetable garden four-inch Jimmy Choos I would! I tried, the heels got planted. But that doesn’t mean the hair and makeup don’t have to be there. It must, I’m a girl, I WAS BORN THIS WAY! I love being a girl. Why would I want to be something I am not? Because it’s a political agenda created by women who hate men and hate women even more, because left wing feminists wish they were born male, not female.

As I noted above: If FemiNazis have to rearrange every little girl’s mind into hating who she was born as, and destroy who she is supposed to be, by their gods those FemiNazis will!

However, FemiNazis are fighting a losing battle called the Markets and what sells to whom, and they are not going to win this war, the people are. When it comes to what sells, Lego sells to everyone: Men, women, boys and girls, and feminists can bank this: Bloomberg News reports:

Lego “Revenue has increased 105 percent since 2006, according to the privately held company’s 2010 annual report, and Lego topped $1 billion in U.S. sales for the first time last year. It’s on track to do that again in 2011… The company’s confidence is evident in the launch—a full line of 23 different products backed by a $40 million global marketing push  “

 

Feminists may want to change children by forcing them to play with the toys feminists demand, because consumers make the demands and wise companies cater to whatever consumers want, not political activists.

kids play out this scenario all the time because they don’t care. Lego is the exception that proves the rule. While there are hundreds of different makers of action figures and dolls whose corporate logos children are resoundingly indifferent to, Lego boasts an estimated 85 percent share of the building block market.

 

Dolls sell big to girls, and dolls that are chunky bricks better be pretty, because that’s what the girls want and Lego is making billions giving little girls exactly what they want, and whatever career they choose, they want to do it as girly girls, not boys!

The Radical Feminist Movement has been trying to rip the estrogen out of women for over 50 years, they keep losing because they keep trying to take little girl’s toys away and no matter what feminists do, no matter how left wing parents try to indoctrinate their children into despising what is normal and right, human beings cannot be forcibly changed from who God created them to be into what progressive left wingers want to build, even if built with fake, plastic bricks.

 

Merry Christmas: The Ultimate Gift

Merry Christmas

“For God so loved the world He gave His One and Only Begotten Son, that all who believe in Him shall have everlasting life.” John 3:16

 

What is Christmas? Is it gifts? No, it’s about the Ultimate Gift: The Only living Person who came to earth to pay the entire sin debt of the entire world, in full, at The Cross.

The ultimate Christmas gift is that He, Jesus, became cursed so we would no longer be cursed, for it is written: “Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree’),” Gal. 3:13.

Sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, He has reconciled each of us and called each of us by name.

May you know the depths of His Love for you this Christmas, and experience His Ultimate Promise of Hope, his Ultimate Gift: Salvation.

God Bless you and your family,

Merry Christmas!

Lisa Richards

Government Will Give You The Sexual Immoral Laws You Want In Exchange for Government Control

Last week I discussed sexual immorality becoming all the rage in America. I pointed out that out that in order to have a Communist Revolution first there must be a Sexual Revolution to usher in that goal, but you can’t get away with that if the people are in their right minds and thinking clearly. People can’t be fooled and overcome by those seeking to control them if people are not overcome by sexual immorality. why? Sexual immorality causes sexual addiction and takes over the lives of people, making it easy to control them when they are enslaved by immoral desires.

Once the sexual immorality sets firmly into society and is viewed as normal ( it’s happened with many addicted to porn, many accepting all forms of sexual lifestyles once considered wrong), communism can take hold.

In a society where people are told that everything and anything goes and should be tried if it makes you feel good, is a society easily controlled by government. Once people are absorbed by their desires they don’t care about anything but their desires. They don’t even care that government is taking control as long as they can do what they want. Government needs those people to usher in control over the rest who are fooled into believing tolerance toward everyone and everything is a virtue.

How many Jews assumed Hitler would not go as far as he did and they stayed in Europe, despite rumors of rounding up Jews for mass execution, until it was too late?

People are already absorbed by false sexualities and addictions, while the rest accept such things they once knew to be immoral, wrong, unlawful.  How long before this society no longer sees reality and reality fully overtakes and controls them through government tyranny? As soon as we have an entire generation of boys and girls and men and women who believe they are not the gender they were born, but are anything they want to experiment with. As soon as enough people go along with those gender identity thieves. As soon as enough people believe that all sexual desires are only lifestyle choices. Then government will be able to experiment with them on any level it chooses.

That’s why government will give into any immoral rights people demand: Make immorality a law so the people can act out on anything they desire and they willingly become puppets to a government that says, “government will give you what you want in return for….” and, “Elect me and I’ll give you what you want.”

Satan had the gall to try and tempt Jesus with power, so why wouldn’t government tempt people?

Convince enough people they can be any gender, tell them they can experiment sexually, you will confuse a sufficient amount of people to reject good laws–Nature’s Laws and the Constitution upholding good laws and the natural order of things that include traditional marriage and children, the two things the Left wants absolved in order to usher in the Sexual Revolution that unleashes the Communist Revolution.

Example: The LGBT Movement openly declared they don’t truly want same-sex marriage, their true goal is the destruction of the traditional family through gay marriage. Lesbian activist Masha Gessen publicly declared:

Gay marriage is a lie. Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we’re going to do with marriage when we get there. It’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. … ‘Marriage equality’ becomes ‘marriage elasticity,’ with the ultimate goal of ‘marriage extinction.’ …I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.

And there we have it. Open families. That is part of George Soros’s “Open Society:” No rules, no boundaries, no borders. Allow all people from anywhere to come and go. Open Society must also permit all sexual lifestyles except the traditional one. Once we push the belief of a borderless society, we allow invasion by those who wish undo harm.

By-the-way: When was it morally acceptable for kids to choose anyone they want as mom and dad or dads and moms other than their actual parents? Never, but this new rule is for another purpose: It allows adults to sleep around with anyone by saying it’s technically not an affair, it’s just sexual desires being met in an unrestricted way.

An open society accepts the “do whatever makes you happy” belief. But an open society is not a free society. It is a society that must go along with those in charge, go along with whatever laws are enacted or go to prison, lose your job, lose respect, lose friends. Open society is not liberty, it is government control by a few over the rest it has trapped through their own selfish wants.

What harm can come with the destruction of traditional marriage and family? What harm can come when all sexual desires are permitted? What can go wrong when you give your life over to government in return for your whims being deemed lawful?

Once immorality is accepted the move to get rid of traditional families is accepted. Loss of traditional morals leads to chaos. Once that happens, government takes full control, because people will beg government to take control, to save them from themselves.

Let’s go out on the limb of chaos already growing with phony rights demands: Pedophiles have been demanding rights to their so-called sexuality: Raping children. I reported on this five years-ago for NewsReal Blog, noting that the Left declared it a violation of pedophile rights to ban the perverts from Halloween. Now child predators demand they be given rights to have sex with children under the guise of young love.

Pedophiles have advocates in the one place that should protect society from lunatics and perverts: The mental health arena. In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association went so far as to redefine to pedophilia:

To further define the line between an atypical sexual interest and disorder, the Work Group revised the names of these disorders to differentiate between the behavior itself and the disorder stemming from that behavior (i.e., Sexual Masochism in DSM-IV will be titled Sexual Masochism Disorder in DSM-5). It is a subtle but crucial difference that makes it possible for an individual to engage in consensual atypical sexual behavior without inappropriately being labeled with a mental disorder. With this revision, DSM-5 clearly distinguishes between atypical sexual interests and mental disorders involving these desires or behaviors.

The so-called mental health experts are subtly telling us its possible to engage in sexual desires without actually harming children. What they are saying is, if we don’t label pedophilia a mental disorder or crime, its not really harming children. You don’t have to be a psychologist to read between the openly written lines.

Another organization, B4U-Act, refers to pedophiles as “minor-attracted people,” and is working to help pedophiles gain the same open sexual rights as homosexuals.

In 2011, PJ Media Rob Taylor reported:

The truth of B4U-ACT is made plain by the online activities of those involved in the group. In May of 2009 a “Richard K” working on behalf of B4U-ACT posted the following on a now defunct child molester forum called Boylove.net: For those of you who don’t know, B4U-ACT (www.b4uact.org) is a 501c3 non-profit organization started by Mike Melsheimer, an out BL [boy lover] who posts at Boychat. The goal of B4U-ACT is to promote communication between BLs/GLs and mental health professionals so they can learn about us and start to work with us to counteract stereotyping, stigmatization, and hatred. We also want to help them develop *humane* and ethical ways of working with those BLs who want therapy to deal with society’s hatred, or other issues related or unrelated to being BLs. (B4U-ACT does *not* believe BLs are “sick” and need to be “cured”.)

B4U-Act was founded 30 years-ago by a convicted child rapist. Notice society allows rapists to roam free. The same society jailed a county clerk for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses because it bothers her conscience.

Next you will be told pedophiles are an entirely new gender and county clerks must give them licenses to marry children.

Don’t be surprised if pedophiles demand rights to openly adopt children so they can live their life-style choice in a loving home environment. Why not? Our open society has many believing no one is born heterosexual, no one is truly born male or female, and everyone has a right to practice whatever sexual preference and they desire they want.

Next, pedophilia will a gender and homosexuals will become a race. They did just get the 14th Amendment, making homosexuality the new black.

How about this: We allow homosexuals to adopt under the guise that “it’s better to have children adopted by loving homosexuals than abusive heterosexuals.” Really? There are no loving heterosexual couples in existence who want children? You are supposed to believe that lie. How many of you have uttered that argument because you actually believe it to be true?

I’m throwing these scenarios out there because perverted lunatics are not just demanding rights, they are being given rights.

By-the-way: It’s intolerant and bigoted to call perverts and lunatics just that. It’s morally justified to trash a Christian woman for wanting to uphold God’s moral laws while asking only that her name not be on the licenses.

Convince enough people they were not born their gender and not only will we destroy traditional marriage and children, we will create an openly sexual society where anything and everything goes until whatever goes hits the fan and everyone’s lives in the worst way. When that happens society will rise up in a violet upheaval against all of this. So don’t assume rights will never be extended until everything becomes so bad it backfires.

If you don’t think this has serious consequences and people wont wage a war against government and society, ask yourself what you would do if your child is raped by a pedophile given rights to that violent lifestyle? Remember that pedophiles don’t just rape children, they murder their victims. How would you react to that if it happens to your child and you are told the pedophile has rights?

One county clerk refusing to file same-sex marriage licenses is an act of conscientious objection that harmed no one, impose unnatural lifestyles beyond the limits of moral law and people will do more than accept prison time, they will fight back and end the corruption.

What we are seeing today will in fact lead to corruption beyond just the taking of Christian moral rights to impose phony rights, the controlling tentacles of an Open Society will reach beyond the limits to our personal lives and individual liberties. When society loses liberty because a few are propped up with lawless immoral rights, the people will not stand by and allow government tyranny to continue before the people react violently against the government.

The Communist Revolution has been slowly growing through the Sexual Revolution, but how long it will continue is hard to say. No tyrannical government can withstand the force of the people when the people lose liberty. We know this from our American history. That background will eventually rouse the people to fight back and tear down this present government and society and restore what was trampled.

Post 9/11 New Normal: Obama Wants to Give Iran Weapons of Mass Destruction…What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Obama wants to provide the most violent regime on earth with nuclear warfare because giving your enemy what it wants to use against you is how you stop your enemy from destroying you. What could possibly go wrong?

14 years later the new normal is appeasing the enemy and laying yourself on the beheading black.

Remember when Weapons of Mass Destruction were the things of fairy tales?  Now we bestow them as appeasement gifts.

Remember when George W. Bush said Iraq had WMDs?  The media raged against the mere suggestion that Saddam had WMDs, demanding we should not go to war. Even when Media showed pictures of thousands of chemically gassed petrified corpses, even when the Media admitted Saddam committed those atrocities, that was not actual proof Saddam had used WMDS against human beings.

It’s sort of like, “I did not have sex with that woman!”  Even when Clinton’s affair was proven true, it was not wrong because a Democrat did it.  The same Democrat who, in 1992, told the country he would finish what George H. W. Bush did not finish–take out Saddam. then it was a good thing to go after Saddam…even though Clinton never did. He had aspirin factories to bomb and wars to wage against Milosevic, who in actuality retaliated against Muslims in his country because Muslims were mass murdering Jews. That’s a good thing in the eyes of the Left, fighting Muslims is a heinous crime against humanity that deserves less Jews controlling the banks!

Remember how Saddam didn’t have destructive weapons, nor did he use them against human beings? Saddam did have WMDs, our military found his WMD caches, it was been proven through military documents and to this day the Media still ignores the proof Saddam used chemical WMDs on mass numbers of human beings–even when the Media showed us all those photos of petrified corpses gassed by Saddam! Why? It was the fact Bush said Saddam had WMDs (meaning nuclear warfare) and there was no way Saddam had anything close to it, even though it was discovered.

Back then the Media ignored what the military found. If Obama found the WMDs they would have existed. Of course Obama would have handed them back to Saddam in exchange for never breaking another UN resolution or massacring human lives.

We don’t punish our enemies anymore, we reward them—with nukes.

Think about it: We went into Iraq, removed the regime, but we did not take out the real problem: Islam and its followers. We left that violent movement, as well as the entire Muslim world we have never retaliated against for the attacks it has committed against us prior to 9/11.

We were going to “change the hearts and minds” of psychopaths hell-bent on destroying the world for the Islamic Caliphate. Now that lie the Media believed and pushed.

The Media and the Left never pointed out where Bush was wrong on that phony “change” philosophy because the Left itself does not believe this: You can’t win the hearts and minds of seventh century psychopaths and you never will. If you go to war against Islam (or anyone), if you’re going to invade an enemy, you must take them all out. Destroy them the way we did to Japan or don’t bother going in or you will face decades of war.

Because we did not destroy Afghanistan or Iraq after invading, and we never destroyed Iran for its decades of violent threats, we now face mass horrors against the West aided by high powered weapons supplied by Russia.

Notice the anti-war media supported Obama’s violent Arab Spring that overthrew a government that protected Israel and was in good standing with the USA? Because Obama wanted to prop up the Muslim Brotherhood and usher Islam further into the world. That’s not an assumption, its fact. Everyone knows it but not enough have the guts to say it publicly. Fear of being called a racist and bigot.

If you are Christian or Jew, you are a racist and bigot by birth. in the eyes of the Left, so why try to appease them. Going along will get you nothing but conquered.

The Media supported Obama’s escalating the Iraq War, they stood behind Obama going into Libya (Kaddafi gave up his WMDs when he saw what Bush did to Saddam, he backed down, behaved) and ignored the four men who were slaughtered by Libyan Muslims. Even Mitt Romney allowed Obama to get away with the Benghazi Massacre during the 2012 Candy Crowley debate when Romney had the chance to expose Obama and the “stand down” orders to voters.

Obama has helped Syria amass more power with Russia’s help by not stopping them. Now Obama wants to take thousands of Assad’s Muslims through the phony refugee status.

Think about this: The anti-war media supports giving WMDs to a war-mongering Iran intent on blowing up America, the UK, and Israel before taking over the West. It’s not just because Obama is masterminding this, the Left sides with Islam the way it sides with communism—because both are destructive anti-American forces and the Left hates the West and America.

In the post-9/11 “new normal” never accuse violent Muslim dictators or regimes of evil, that’s offensive. Give the violent enemy the nuclear warfare it wants to act on its threats against the United States and Israel, that’s wise diplomacy. Besides, the USA and Israel deserve it!

In the new normal it’s great that Obama escalates the wars, bad if we remotely consider ending wars by destroying the enemy.

President Obama wants Iran nuked to the hilt and ready to aim and destroy, but when George W. Bush accused Iraq of having WMDs and using them on people the United States was evil for such accusations.

When a Marxist hands weapons of any mass destruction to the enemy it’s fabulous, when a Republican tries to prevent that it’s really bad.

We truly learned nothing from 9/11 and all attacks since then. But the Left has, that’s why it goes along with a Marxist president negotiating with the Muslim World. And the problem is many Americans are brainwashed, they assume Muslims are peaceful and willingly go along with the new normal belief that Muslims have a right to be in our country.

Most American Rabbis and Hollywood Jews are supporting giving Iran nuclear weapons and taking in Muslim refugees.

That’s the new normal: Commit suicide by allowing the enemy to murder your country.

There’s nothing wrong with atrocities when they are committed by evil dictators. It’s considered immoral when the United States has no choice but to drop two atomic bombs on Japan (once the most violent regime on earth rivaling Nazi Germany in methods of mass murder) in order to save the entire world from Japanese terror.

How about this: To this day many Americans rail in anger against the United States weaponizing the Mujahideen under Reagan because they became the Taliban and Osama bin Laden was a Mujahideen in the late 70s and early 80s. We had to fight the Taliban years later. But how often do you hear outcries against Jimmy Carter, who armed those rebels first in the 70s? Reagan continued the fight because it was against the Soviets, but it was ruinous when Reagan carried out what Carter started.

Double standard? Yes. Left versus right. Whatever the Left does is okay, even if it means the mass slaughter of millions, but if the Right goes to war to stop mass slaughter, it’s despicable.

It was considered disgraceful when Reagan called the Soviet Union and “Evil Empire,” because the Soviets were communists, but when Bush called Iran, Iraq, and North Korea the “Axis of Evil” the Left went into convulsive head-spins. that’s because the Left is communist and anything that exposes their motherland of ideology is criminal.

Our government apologizes by arming one with WMDS and appeasing an obese Asian who wears Star Trek costumes with the diplomatic gift of Dennis Rodman.

How did we go from Kissinger to Rodman?

When Iran kidnapped Americans in Tehran in 1979 and chanted “Death To America” in front of TV cameras, telling the United States that Iran intended to destroy us while holding us captive, that ambush was not viewed by the Left as terrible. Nearly 40 years later, Iran still chants “Death to America” and threatens to bomb us in nuclear attacks.  Rather than send them a powerful message through military strength our Marxist-run government is giving Iran nuclear warfare.

Wake up America: Obama can’t do this alone, he has people on his side in government, Hollywood producers and directors (Jews who hate Jews and Israel), many Rabbis, our braindead allies ushering in a new anti-Semitism to rival 1930s Europe, and a lot of truly  ignorant voters who think the best way to achieve peace is nuke-up the enemy.

That makes as much sense as European Jews providing Hitler with oven factories. What could possibly go wrong?

It makes as much sense as giving Japan the Bomb in exchange for peace and good behavior. What could have possibly gone wrong if Japan was given the bomb?

Why don’t we just hand over Israel and the United States to Islam? Oh wait, we did by telling Iran it can have nukes and never deporting Muslims from this country.

The new normal is inviting your enemy to dwell among you while you hand over your weapons to them. What could possibly go wrong?

Muslim Refugees and Hispanic Illegals Are Not Like The Immigrants Of 1900: They Want to Tear America down, Not Build Her Up

How feel pity for Hispanic illegals and Muslim immigrants because your ancestors came to America during the large influx of European immigrants at the turn of the late 1800s/1900s? How many of you refer to the dislike of illegal Hispanics and Muslims as the same as Victorian America’s dislike of Irish immigrants? If you do, you’re fooled by Group Think leftists demanding you accept open borders and George Soros’s Open Society in order that they can destroy this American society, culture, and heritage.

Left wingers insist disliking Muslims and South-of-the-Borders illegals is akin to those who hated the Irish. You can’t compare Muslims and illegal Hispanics to the Irish who never immigrated to tear down this country and remake it into the Emerald Isle.

Muslims have been invading us under the phony guise of refugee since 1979. We willfully ignore what Iran did to the United States in 1979. Instead, we give them Visas.

Too many feel sorry for so-called refugees, comparing them to Europeans who not only came here legally, but none were members of a 1400 year-old terrorist movement that commands all followers to slaughter everyone.

Muslim refugees get rid of their identities before leaving their homelands, purchase false IDs claiming they’re Christian in order to gain entrance into Europe and American. Technically they don’t have to do that, they need only scream “Allah Akbar!” and gullible guilt-fed nations welcome them while laying everyone’s head on the chopping block to appease terrorists.

Muslim children are taught to wage jihad and “slay the infidels” by the time they can walk and talk.

Did your European ancestors come to the United States to murder Americans or become Americans? Were your ancestors taught to kill everyone not Christian or Jew? No. But many believe Muslims are peaceful people belonging to a religion hijacked by a few radicals because George W. Bush told you so after 9/11. He lied for political reasons or he never would have done that or allowed thousands of Muslims to enter this country after 9/11, while never deporting any.

They’re not refugees, they’re here to commit terror, but first they must live among us peacefully, conning us into assuming they’re peaceful, while plotting against us and our nation they intend on waging war against from the inside.

Europeans never did that or considered that, so don’t compare the two.

Too many are ignorant: Islam has a 1400 year-old doctrine in the Koran and Hadith commanded by Mohamad called Hijra, meaning migration. Muslims are instructed by Mohammad to immigrate into every non-Islamic country in order to form colonies in “enemy territory” and spread Islam through jihad. But they must do so first through covert actions that make us accommodate their religion and culture. The Qur’an says:

And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance. And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful. (Koran, 4:100)

(To further understand, read Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration)

The same immigration lie is used by illegals. The Left wants us to feel sorry for South Americans and Mexicans, they’re oppressed people. They’re not, they’re the worst of the worst and their countries don’t want them and send them here, going so far as to teach them how to invade our southern borders with a doctrinal guidebook created by their homeland governments teaching illegals how to invade and take from us.

Note that Mexico 

“welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society” and “Foreigners are admitted into Mexico ‘according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.’”

TD you believe this lie:  “They are hardworking people who are doing the jobs Americans refuse to do,” or, “they are hardworking people here for a better life.”

  1. Americans were doing those landscaping and house cleaning jobs until illegal Hispanics moved in offering to do the jobs at a fraction of the American price. That took the jobs away from Americans so Americans cannot compete against cheap labor. What American would willingly want the lowest, third world pay possible? Only a stupid moron desperate to never get ahead!
  2. Of course illegal Hispanics are here for a better life: As noted, Mexican and South American governments tell them how to invade us and take welfare benefits by the hundreds of billions they send part of back to their homelands to enrich their homelands.
  3. Of course many come here for a better life: They work here, take the money, save it, and retire back to their homelands where our money allows them to live like kings while our country is left in shambles from their cultural destruction.

Not all intend to leave, they intend to conquer and force the United States to become one with Mexico.

Muslims have no plans on making money and leaving. Their intent is conquer the United States and turn it into a Muslim nation. Did you ancestors do that?  No, that’s why you are American and not your ancestral background.

Have you seen illegal and legal Hispanics assimilate to the United States culture, heritage, and our English language, or do you hear them speaking Spanish, even at work? That is because they demand we assimilate to them.

Did your ancestors work hard to shed off their old life and former country for America or force America to become a multi-lingual nation? How many of you speak your ancestors former languages?  If you’re like me, you studied foreign languages in high school because those languages were already forbidden in their homes by the time your ancestors American born children came along.

Europeans who came here wanted to be American and built this country to greatness. Muslims and illegal Hispanics are coming to destroy this nation through various means of war from violent gangs to jihad. And both demand we change and accommodate them.

If you move to Mexico and demand Mexicans absolve their language and culture for your American language and culture, they’ll plant cocaine on you and arrest you so you disappear in a prison.

That has invaded us and what they are doing? We’re inviting 10,000 Muslim refugees to join the tens of millions of Hispanic illegals.

The Muslim faith is about conquering the world for the Muslim religion and its caliphate (Islamic government worldwide as ushered through Mohammad’s rampage, the caliph being the Muslim leader they all follow) or they would not heavily populate outside the Middle East.

Pew Research says,

nearly two-thirds (62%) of Muslims live in the Asia-Pacific region, according to the Pew Research analysis. In fact, more Muslims live in India and Pakistan (344 million combined) than in the entire Middle East-North Africa region (317 million).

Look at Britain. Muslims have their way with the laws. In 2008, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowen Williams, declared that adopting Islamic Sharia law in Britain “seems unavoidable and, as a matter of fact, certain conditions of Sharia are already recognised in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system.”

Williams said Britain needed to advocate “plural jurisdiction” for Muslims to live in areas governed only by Sharia and not Parliament. Williams felt Muslims had a right to live separate from the rest under their own laws:

“There is a place for finding what would be a constructive accommodation with some aspects of Muslim law as we already do with aspects of other kinds of religious law. It would be quite wrong to say that we could ever license a system of law for some community which gave people no right of appeal, no way of exercising the rights that are guaranteed to them as citizens in general. But there are ways of looking at marital disputes, for example, which provide an alternative to the divorce courts as we understand them. In some cultural and religious settings they would seem more appropriate.

Islam demand everyone adhere to Sharia and Islam, not the other way around.

You don’t think that can come to America? It’s already here and it’s called “Stealth Jihad.”

Stealth jihad came to America after 9/11 under the disguise enabled through George W. Bush—“tolerance” toward “the religion of peace.” Muslims cleverly invaded us through nonviolent schemes. If people invade through violence, those attacked will wise up and fight. Your initiative must be seemingly peaceable. This is what stealth, i.e., “soft,” “covert,” jihad is: Impose Islamic Law, i.e., Sharia, across the entire nation and region, and earth, through non-combative amicable means—“tolerance,” “religion of peace.”

America deemed one group  “peaceful” and another “hardworking.” Both are violent and destructive. But they work hard at it.

After 14 years of marketing the “Islam is peace” propaganda as cleverly as Hitler marketed Jews as monsters, Muslims are able to smear everyone in the United States (the way Hitler smeared Jews) who sees through Islam as “Islamophobic,” “intolerant,” “Bigoted,” “racist,” and now they demand civil rights as oppressed victims. Had Bush never pulled the “Islam is peace” and we must tolerate Islam and its followers rubbish, the America that had a huge wakeup call and was awake on 9/11 would never have fallen back into the slumber we’re in toward Muslims.

Muslims and illegal Hispanics are the new black and Joan of Arc and Americans the witch hunting fire starters.

We are thanks to political leaders, schools and universities, the media and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) all convincing Americans that Islam means peace (it means submit) and jihad does not mean what you read in the Koran or Hadith. You’re misreading Mohammad. Jihad is actually the inner quest for spiritual serenity and moral purity.

The fact is Muslims believe they gain spiritual tranquility and moral purity when they wage jihad (war) against the world and rid the world of non-Muslims.

And we go along by doing this: How often do you hear this, “Look how we once hated the Japanese, now we are friends. We once interned them after they attacked us and now we love them, so we need to change our views toward Islam and Muslims.” Or, “we used to mistreat blacks, we are doing the same toward illegals when we say deport them with their American born children.” Their children are not American citizens, because the parents came here illegally. They broke the “jurisdiction” laws.

So, as we allow ourselves to be conquerors by Muslims invading by the tens of thousands, we have surrendered ourselves to tens of millions of illegal Hispanics who are not here for a better life, but to invade and conquer. And we are going along because we don’t want to be racist bigots.

If only we were bigoted toward evil as we once were.

Yes, I would be in full support of ending Islam and the Muslim world the way we did the old Japan, but today’s Americans feel it’s cruel to annihilate evil in order to save billions of innocents on the planet.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 12,039 other followers

%d bloggers like this: