Yesterday I asked readers, which poses the greatest threat to the future of the United States and her people: Restoring the United States back to a Constitutional Republic or inviting South–of-the-border illegals who bring diseases and violent crime to the United States.
Now I’ll ask you which poses the greatest threat to the United States, gays not being allowed to marry, women not getting free birth control pills (despite years of demanding men should be in charge of birth control), and equal pay to women and low-skilled illiterates whose excelling talent is scanning your store items for the computer to ad up the sum, or head-lopping Muslims?
What has become more important to Americans is not national security, but phony rights to everything and anything that can be twisted into a right by misusing the Constitution.
My darling Americans, get your eyes of the Kardashian’s gigantic rear-ends for two minutes and understand this: None of you will have any rights left when Muslims start beheading Americans. Oh wait, they already have, and Americans, for the most part, don’t consider Islam a threat, because you know, that violent movement that commands rape, torture, war on non-Muslims, beheading of every non-Muslim under Islamic law—Sharia, along with raping and torturing Muslim women and gays who speak out and try to leave Islam, is really a religion of peace. So we Americans should not be worrying about violent head-loppers invading us when gays need something old, something new, something borrowed, and something blue!
Two weeks-ago an Oklahoma woman was beheaded in the workplace by a Muslim co-worker (the media calls beheading co-workers “workplace violence”) because the non-Muslim woman refused to convert to Islam and she disagreed with stoning women. The Muslim did what all Muslims are trained to do according to Islam:
“inveterate enemies (Sura 4:101),” “arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere (Sura 9:5),” “seize them [infidels] and put them to death wherever you find them, kill them wherever you find them, seek out the enemies of Islam relentlessly (Sura 4:90),” “Fight them until Islam reigns supreme (Sura 2:193),” and “Cut off their heads, and cut off the tips of their fingers (Sura 8:12).”
Wow! Islam is so peaceful…after you’re dead, without your head!
Do you readers still think rights to everything under the sun is as vital as preventing Islam’s intent—jihad and slaughter for conquering the United States and slaughtering all non-Muslims?
According to Islam and the Koran, Muslims must wage war against every non-Muslim (Sura 9:123). If all Muslims do not go to war against infidels, Allah will kill them (Sura 9:39). Muslims are commanded by the Koran and their imams that “the heat of war is fierce, but more fierce is the heat of Hell-fire (Sura 9:81).”
How about some quotes straight from the goat’s mouth!
On August 26, 2014, jihadi cleric Hussein bin Mahmoud told Memri magazine that: “Islam is a religion of power, fighting, jihad, beheading and bloodshed,” and that “Chopping off the heads of infidels is an act whose permissibility the [Muslim] ummah agrees on. Beheading a harbi infidel is a blessed act for which a Muslim is rewarded,” going on to state “How many hadiths [commanded by] the Prophet’s Companions have we read in which they demanded that he strike the necks of certain men, and the Prophet did not condemn the striking of necks… Striking necks was a well-known matter that did not elicit any condemnation in the eras of the Prophet, the rightly-guided caliphs and their successors.”
Bin Mahmoud told Memri that Islam and the Koran commands beheading as a way to enforce terror in all infidels, further admitting that Islam is not a religion of peaceful religion, “Islam is a religion of beheading” because Islam’s true meaning is jihad and martyrdom.
Bin Mahmoud further stated that”
The truth is that what distorts the image of Islam is not the beheading and terrorizing of infidels, but rather those who want [prefer following] Mandela or Ghandi, with no killing, fighting, brutality, bloodshed or the striking of heads or necks. That is not the religion of Muhammad son of ‘Abdallah who was sent [against the world] with the sword [for] Judgment Day. The only Koranic surah that is named after him, Surah Muhammad, is called ‘The Surah of Fighting’…
Do readers think this Muslim jihadists quotes are not a problem for America:
Islam is a religion of power, fighting, jihad, beheading and bloodshed, not a religion of turning the left cheek to whoever slapped you on the right cheek.
Does that sound like Christianity or Judaism? Does it even sound like Atheism?
Does Islam and its followers sound like they believe in Freedom of Religion?
Does Islam’s Sharia sound anything like the Constitutional and any of the Bill of Rights Amendments? How about basic human rights?
Do you still feel equal pay, gay marriage rights, free birth control, more welfare and food stamps doled out, more gun bans and harsher penalties against gun owners, and government controlled education is more important than preventing the growth of a movement and people who believe they have full rights to kill any person they want if the Koran and Islam consider it a “just cause (Sura 6:152),” because Allah loves all Muslims who “fight for his cause (Sura 61:3)” and he hates anyone who refuses to fight, or fights against Allah, or renounces Islam in favor of another religion, those Muslims must be “put to death or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off alternative sides (Sura 5:34).”
We Americans better reject Islam, stop assuming Muslims are nice cuddly people and start banning all Islamic immigration, deporting all non-citizens–I prefer we deport ALL Muslims period!– and those connected to and suspected of terror, because if we do not reject Islam, bring to an end the building of mosques and Islamic centers in America (which is not about practicing religion, rather conquering America by-way-of land, neighborhood and town takeovers) Islam will further attack us all on U.S. soil and we will all find ourselves in a literal, physical war to protect ourselves from being slaughtered by people who believe they must do to all what was done to that innocent Oklahoma woman:
Slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush (Koran 9:5).
Islam is already in the United States and Muslims have bombed our streets, beheaded a woman, they have executed their own daughters for leaving Islam, and are calling for our American, Western infidel destruction.
Now, which do you think is vital to America’s security: Phony, self-centered rights, or shutting the borders, deporting all illegals and their attempt to take over the United States, and banning all Muslim immigration and stopping Islam in America?
Which poses the greatest threat to the future of the United States: Restoring the United States back to a Constitutional Republic where all Americans are working and building their goals to fruition or allowing South–of-the-border illegals, who bring diseases and violent crime into the United States and steal jobs that once belonged to the middle class, to stay and destroy the nation?
For today’s reading, we’ll start with Illegals, tomorrow; we’ll discuss the threat of Islam.
Most Americans consider it a horrid idea to deport all illegals because it might make us appear racist. Heaven forbid!
Never mind we were founded by white Europeans, not South Americans or Mexicans and Americans are not culturally South American or Mexican: Our language is English, our culture and heritage is that of our forefather founders and what they set up. That culture and heritage built a very American country where once, all who came here became American and not the country they left.
Because of illegal immigration the middle class sunk.
The Left, the Democrats, do not want a middle class rising back to the pre-1965 era where most Americans worked and saved—that included black Americans, who prior to Lyndon Johnson, were mostly not on welfare and belonged to intact families–because work, money and private property free you from leader’s control.
Too many of you are brainwashed and believe a Constitutional Republic is a bad idea: It would end all government programs and administrative agencies like the IRS. Those of you who think this way do not realize that abolishing those things means all Americans would have available work, earn and keep 100% of their earnings, never handing over 50% or more of their paycheck and property taxes to the government.
Reverting back to the Constitution means Article I, Section. 8: All Americans pay a one time only, across-the-board, upon purchasing something new, Consumption Tax. Constitution restoration and adherence also means deportation of all illegals.
Reverting back to our Constitution would save this country. Allowing foreign invaders has put us in grave danger.
But too many refuse to believe illegal aliens are a threat to the United States, because after all, “aren’t they doing the jobs no American will do?” Illegals are doing those jobs because our government wants illegals only doing low-skilled jobs like landscaping and house cleaning. The government makes false claims that Americans won’t do the work illegals do so illegals can take over.
Before the 1965 Immigration Acts, The U.S. was a well-paid middle class country where everyone was of one society, language, and culture no matter ancestry, and everyone was able to earn, save, and buy a home. Many rose up to the upper echelons, because work was available to Americans.
The United States Government made sure Americans lost middle class jobs at real wages and purposely opened borders to third world immigration to destroy this nation.
Ted Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act along with the Hart-Seller 1965 Act, made sure millions of illegal third world immigrants from the Eastern and Western hemisphere flooded U.S. borders on the phony grounds of “family reunification and employment preferences.”
The 1965 Immigration Bill destroyed the vital 1920a quota system that protected this nation’s existence and economic growth.
Placing quotas was considered racist by the Left; it was unfair to have an unequal percentage of Hispanics in America, we needed an equal cut, an equal mix of color and race in this awful WASPy country!
The so-called color-blinding of America was the erroneous product of cultural Marxism that demanded a fair share Crayola society by Democrats who sought to right non-existent wrongs in a country where the only wrong needing fixing was segregated Americans.
The government promised that Middle Eastern and Far Eastern immigration would be limited. It was South America and Mexico the Left wanted flooding U.S. borders.
1965 Immigration was all about racial equality: End America’s whiteness. Get rid of well-skilled immigrants, ignore disease infected countries and threats to national security, and let all immigrating hold onto their old culture. Destroy assimilation, become multicultural!
1965 Immigration was called “reunification,” but it has had the most negative effect on this country: It destroyed our heritage, culture, and English language.
We were sold a bill of goods that opened U.S. borders to security threats: Diseases and terror and violent crime:
The unexpected result has been one of the greatest waves of immigration in the nation’s history—more than 18 million legal immigrants since the law’s passage, over triple the number admitted during the previous 30 years, as well as uncountable millions of illegal immigrants. And the new immigrants are more likely to stay (rather than return home after a time) than those who came around the turn of the century. Moreover, this new, enlarged immigration flow came from countries in Asia and Latin America which heretofore had sent few of their sons and daughters to the United States. And finally, although the average level of education of immigrants has increased somewhat over the past 30 years, the negative gap between their education and that of native-born Americans has increased significantly, creating a mismatch between newcomers and the needs of a modern, high-tech economy.
The 1965 Act demanded an end to origin quotas: Democratic California Representative Philip Burton stated before Congress that:
Just as we sought to eliminate discrimination in our land through the Civil Rights Act, today we seek by phasing out the national origins quota system to eliminate discrimination in immigration to this nation composed of the descendants of immigrants (Congressional Record, Aug. 25, 1965, p. 21783).
Burton’s words are clever, but the real meaning behind this so-called end to justified and needed discrimination toward immigrants was about flooding the United States with South Americans and Mexicans, third world countries, in order to end white European immigration.
President Truman and Eisenhower were of the same belief that we end the isolation quotas and the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act that upheld the national origins quota system:
These are only a few examples of the absurdity, the cruelty of carrying over into this year of 1952 the isolationist limitations of our 1924 law. In no other realm of our national life are we so hampered and stultified by the dead hand of the past, as we are in this field of immigration (Truman, Harry S., Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1961, pp. 443-444).
In 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower demanded of Congress:
I again urge the liberalization of some of our restrictions upon immigration…we should double the 154,000 quota immigrants … we should make special provisions for the absorption of many thousands of persons who are refugees (Eisenhower, Dwight D., Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1961, pp. 308-310).
On July 23, 1963, President Kennedy, who never signed a Civil Rights Act, said of the quota system:
It neither satisfies a national need nor accomplishes an international purpose. In an age of interdependence among nations, such a system is an anachronism for it discriminates among applicants for admission into the United States on the basis of the accident of birth (Kennedy, John F., Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1964, pp. 594-597).
Everything promised backfired. Our American national origins have been trampled by illegal immigrants invading with diseases, trafficking humans and drugs, filling our prison system with raping murderers, and robbing Americans of jobs Americans would do at normal American wages versus third world wages created to destroy the U.S. economy.
The limitations on Middle Eastern countries also backfired as Islamic immigration has increased. With Muslim immigration comes terror against the United States in order to conquer this nation.
And Americans keep falling for the Democrat propaganda that created a society with two generations of self-loathing, brainwashed, guilt-fed whites who refuse to believe the 1920s immigration quotas saved this nation from terror, diseases–Ebola and Tuberculosis just to name two, and economical destruction caused by low skills, illiteracy and crime.
By-the-way: If you catch tuberculosis, thank your neighbor who hires Spanish-speaking, south-of-the-border foreigners to landscape and clean their house.
Democrats considered the 1920s quotas bigotry and prehistoric, yet those quotas did not prevent black Americans beyond the South from working. It was segregation enforced by Democrats that was antediluvian, not immigration quotas.
The Left purposely went overboard fighting discrimination, making it an immigration problem. In doing so, they opened the borders to people seeking freedom to destroy this nation.
Now we are facing the threat of losing everything the Constitutional Republic was founded on because too many Americans sit by complacent—usually watching “Dancing With The Stars”—rather than taking to the streets the way legal and illegal Hispanics do against Americans: Protesting!
Americans should demand deportation and the end of government handouts to non-citizens.
Which do you consider the real threat: Ending government programs and taxation beyond the 17 Powers, or over 50 million illegals aliens stealing this nation through invasion for conquer?